Download links for: video and captions.
This research “Long-Range Thermal 3D Perception in Low Contrast Environments” is funded by NASA contract 80NSSC21C0175
Basically, one need to direct the ip cam stream (mjpeg or rtsp) to a virtual v4l2 device which acts like a web cam and is automatically picked up by a web browser or a web cam application. This can be easily done by gstreamer or ffmpeg.
~$ sudo apt install v4l2loopback-dkms
~$ sudo modprobe v4l2loopback devices=1
The options below are for gstreamer/ffmpeg and rtsp/mjpeg streams:
gstreamer:
# rtsp stream
~$ sudo gst-launch-1.0 rtspsrc location=rtsp://192.168.0.9:554 ! rtpjpegdepay ! jpegdec ! videoconvert ! tee ! v4l2sink device=/dev/video0 sync=false
# mjpeg stream
~$ sudo gst-launch-1.0 souphttpsrc is-live=true location=http://192.168.0.9:2323/mimg ! jpegdec ! videoconvert ! tee ! v4l2sink device=/dev/video0
ffmpeg:
# rtsp stream
~$ sudo ffmpeg -i rtsp://192.168.0.9:554 -fflags nobuffer -pix_fmt yuv420p -f v4l2 /dev/video0
# mjpeg stream
~$ sudo ffmpeg -i http://192.168.0.9:2323/mimg -fflags nobuffer -pix_fmt yuv420p -r 30 -f v4l2 /dev/video0
Start a video conference application, select the webcam from the menu (/dev/video0).
Test link: meet.jit.si
(more…)
Figure 1. Talon (“instructor/student”) test camera.
Update: arXiv:1911.06975 paper about this project.
This post concludes the series of 3 publications dedicated to the progress of Elphel five-month project funded by a SBIR contract.
After developing and building the prototype camera shown in Figure 1, constructing the pattern for photogrammetric calibration of the thermal cameras (post1), updating the calibration software and calibrating the camera (post2) we recorded camera image sets and processed them offline to evaluate the result depth maps.
The four of the 5MPix visible range camera modules have over 14 times higher resolution than the Long Wavelength Infrared (LWIR) modules and we used the high resolution depth map as a ground truth for the LWIR modules.
Without machine learning (ML) we received average disparity error of 0.15 pix, trained Deep Neural Network (DNN) reduced the error to 0.077 pix (in both cases errors were calculated after removing 10% outliers, primarily caused by ambiguity on the borders between the foreground and background objects), Table 1 lists this data and provides links to the individual scene results.
For the 160×120 LWIR sensor resolution, 56° horizontal field of view (HFOV) and 150 mm baseline, disparity of one pixel corresponds to 21.4 meters. That means that at 27.8 meters this prototype camera distance error is 10%, proportionally lower for closer ranges. Use of the higher resolution sensors will scale these results – 640×480 and longer baseline of 200 mm (instead of the current 150 mm) will yield 10% accuracy at 150 meters, 56°HFOV.
(more…)
Figure 1. Calibration of the quad visible range + quad LWIR camera.
We’ve got the first results of the photogrammetric calibration of the composite (visible+LWIR) Talon camera described int the previous post and tested the new pattern. In the first experiments with the new software code we’ve got average reprojection error for LWIR of 0.067 pix, while the visible quad camera subsystem was calibrated down to 0.036 pix. In the process of calibration we acquired 3 sequences of 8-frame (4 visible + 4 LWIR) image sets, 60 sets from each of the 3 camera positions: 7.4m from the target on the target center line, and 2 side views from 4.5m from the target and 2.2 m right and left from the center line. From each position camera axis was scanned in the range of ±40° horizontally and ±25° vertically.
(more…)
Figure 1. Oleg carrying combined LWIR and visible range camera.
While working on extremely long range 3D visible range cameras we realized that the passive nature of such 3D reconstruction that does not involve flashing lasers or LEDs like LIDARs and Time-of-Flight (ToF) cameras can be especially useful for thermal (a.k.a LWIR – long wave infrared) vision applications. SBIR contract granted at the AF Pitch Day provided initial funding for our research in this area and made it possible.
We are now in the middle of the project and there is a lot of the development ahead, but we have already tested all the hardware and modified our earlier code to capture and detect calibration pattern in the acquired images.
(more…)After we coupled the Tile Processor (TP) that performs quad camera image conditioning and produces 2D phase correlation in space-invariant form with the neural network[1], the TP remained the bottleneck of the tandem. While the inferred network uses GPU and produces disparity output in 0.5 sec (more than 80% of this time is used for the data transfer), the TP required tens of seconds to run on CPU as a multithreaded Java application. When converted to run on the GPU, similar operation takes just 0.087 seconds for four 5 MPix images, and it is likely possible to optimize the code farther — this is our first experience with Nvidia® CUDA™.
(more…)
Figure 1. Network diagram. One of the tested configurations is shown.
Neural network connected to the output of the Tile Processor (TP) reduced the disparity error twice from the previously used heuristic algorithms. The TP corrects optical aberrations of the high resolution stereo images, rectifies images, and provides 2D correlation outputs that are space-invariant and so can be efficiently processed with the neural network.
What is unique in this project compared to other ML applications for image-based 3D reconstruction is that we deal with extremely long ranges (and still wide field of view), the disparity error reduction means 0.075 pix standard deviation down from 0.15 pix for 5 MPix images.
See also: arXiv:1811.08032
(more…)
June 19, CVPR 2018, booth 132
We uploaded an image set with 2D correlation data together with the import Python code for experiments with the neural networks and are now looking for collaboration with those who would love to apply their DL experience to the new kind of input data. More data will follow and we welcome feedback to make this data set more useful.
The application area we are interested in is an extremely long distance 3D scene reconstruction and ranging with the distance to baseline ratio of 1000:1 to 10,000:1 while preserving wide field of view. Earlier post describes aircraft distance and velocity measurements with up to 3,000:1 distance-to-baseline ratio and 60°(H)×45°(V) field of view.
Figure 1. Space-invariant 2D phase correlation data
The data set contains 2D phase correlation output calculated from the 2592×1936 Bayer mosaic source images captured by the quad stereo camera, and Disparity Space Image (DSI) calculated from a pair of such cameras. Longer baseline provides higher range resolution and this DSI is serving as the ground truth for a single quad camera. The source images as well as all the used software is also provided under the GNU/GPLv3 license. DSI is organized as a 324×242 array – each sample is calculated from the corresponding 16×16 tile. Tiles are overlapping (as shown in Figure 3) with stride 8.
These data sets are provided together with the fully reconstructed X3D scene models, viewable in the browser (Wavefront OBJ files are also generated). The scene models are different from the raw DSI as the next software stages generate meshes, and that frequently leads to over-simplification of the original DSI (so most fronto parallel objects in the scene provide better range accuracy when probed near the bottom). Each scene is accompanied with the multi-layer TIFF file (*-DSI_COMBO.tiff) that allows to see the difference between the measured DSI and the one used in the rendered X3D model. File format and Python import software is documented in Oleg’s post “Reading quad stereo TIFF image stacks in Python and formatting data for TensorFlow”, the data files are directly viewable with ImageJ.
(more…)
Fig.1 TIFF image stack
~$ python3 imagej_tiff.py <filename>.tiff
It will print header info in the terminal and display the layers (and decoded values) using Matplotlib.
(more…)