by Oleg Dzhimiev
The modes are:
- Direct alternating channels mode.
At first, I rewrote the logic of switching from what I already had and this resulted in parsedit.php “Error 500” and the streamer stop (when the sensors were in the free run mode, in triggered – everything was ok) while it was everything fine with the testbench. Coudn’t find what is wrong for sometime. Part of the logic was based on sync signals levels and under certain conditions the switching didn’t work – the error was corrected by using only the sync signals edges.
Fig.1 A sample frame in the testbench is 2592×3 (to reduce verification time), “ivact” – vertical sync signal, “ihact” – horizontal sync signal, “pxdr” – pixel data. White numbers in ‘ivact’ line represent an appropriate channel.
- Alternating channels – one channel direct, another – bufferred.
With this mode the situation was almost the same as with the previous mode – the same changes but the frame from the second channel, the one that is buffered looks brighter, but if to disable the first channel – the buffered frame is correct:
Fig.2 “framen” – frame enable register, allows work when ‘high’.
Fig.3 Good direct frame (left) and ‘whitened’ buffered frame (right). Probably some signal’s latencies are incorrect.
Is separate due to the problems with other two modes. It’s being added currently.
I’m also making the project less messy, optimizing registers addresses and rewriting scripts to make the work with 10359 easier.
by Andrey Filippov
10373A with BGA chips installed - fragment
Finally I received the 10373A PCB with BGA chips soldered. Still one (DDR3 for the video memory) is missing, we’ll install it later – anyway there is a lot to be done before I’ll need it. But that’s all what is soldered for me – I could not do it by hand. Hundreds of other components are waiting for me – I attached two of the model 353 cameras as microscopes and prepared to solder 0201 resistors and capacitors (0.3mm by 0.6mm) – I’ve never done it before. It may be stupid to try to do that manually, but it did work for me before to use a soldering iron after working with just virtual stuff on the computer. I believe it helps me to find some potential problems in the design while I take components one by one and think of them in different perspective than during the initial design.
And while I was waiting for the components and the board – I made some minor design upgrades to the existent camera – changed the layout of the sensor board to fit better multi-sensor applications (like panoramic video). The new board is just 15mm by 28mm (current 10338 is 32mm x 32mm), so using M12 (S-mount) lenses it is possible to shrink the size of the panoramic head so the distance between the outer elements of the opposite lenses is under 80mm – it is much smaller than similar high-res systems. That distance is important to reduce parallax – most noticable when the objects are close to the camera.
by Andrey Filippov
In September 2009 there were multiple publications about the Open Source Frankencamera developed at Stanford (Open-source camera could revolutionize digital photography). It is really nice to have more participants in the rather new area of the open hardware devices, we at Elphel are also excited about the possibilities of the hardware that users can accommodate to their needs without “jail-breaking” or otherwise modifying the firmware against the manufacturers’ intentions, often having to start over again after each firmware update (or hardware release) by the manufacturer, risking to “brick” their gadgets if something goes wrong in the process.
We believe that having the software and hardware designs “free” and “open” is the only sustainable way to deal with ever-increasing complexity of the designs. Model it after the human activity that proved to be capable of dealing with complex matters – modern science that replaced proprietary and secret knowledge of alchemy and like. This is why we applaud achievements in this area that we are working hard ourselves too.
It is important to have good cooperation in such development, sharing ideas, working together on common standards and API. As of today we are still in minority, traditional (proprietary) camera manufacturers are better organized, but the standards they develop are only sub-optimal for the open hardware.
There is no reference to Elphel (or other similar works) in the article itself, it appears in the Frequently asked questions about the Frankencamera. That page among other things compares their current Stanford OMAP-based version of the camera and Elphel prototype used during development:
Isn’t there already a Linux camera, the Elphel?
Yes there is. In fact, our first Frankencamera prototype was built around an Elphel camera. However, these aren’t really standalone cameras. Once you add a viewfinder and power supply with batteries, you get an awkwardly sized and shaped device. More importantly you get high latency between the sensor and viewfinder. That’s why we switched to a board, based on the TI platform, that includes an LCD touchscreen.
That is correct, we do not have the viewfinder in Elphel cameras and it is not an omission – we try to focus on the core camera parts, leaving visualization to the off-the-shelf gadgets. We believe that others can create “mashups” with appropriate devices. There are many different applications that our users can think about customize our products themselves. In the model 373 we plan to have a second low-res output from the FPGA to simplify viewfinder functionality with low-power devices that fail to render the full resolution/frame rate camera output.
As for the latency – it is really small when using the appropriate video player. The in-camera latency is less than two frames (about 20 scanlines + 1000 pixels in the FPGA – from the sensor port to the compressed bitstream in the system memory buffer and one frame in the buffer before the frame is sent out). When using the MPlayer the host PC latency is also about just one frame that makes it possible to use the camera+PC in real time applications, like a replacement of a rear view mirror in Elphel mobile office
The article says that The imaging chip is taken from a Nokia N95 cell phone but it seems not to be complete. Yes, it may be (and likely is but I do not know for sure – N95 circuit diagram is not posted) the same imaging chip, but according to this posting the sensor front end board is really open source and you can download the documentation (released under GNU FDL license) from Elphel Wiki page
Update:Andrew, thank you for adding information to Frequently asked questions about the Frankencamera .
BTW – we were able to control Canon EOS lenses directly in our model 323C ("C" for "Canon"), we may still have some hardware around. And the code is at Sourceforge – lensraw.html , lensraw.c
I just finished working on a new graphical user interface in the general camera system preferences that should simplify the process of camera firmware upgrade also called “reflashing”. There are quite a few ways to update a cameras firmware so it might be challenging to keep a clear overview: http://wiki.elphel.com/index.php?title=Usage_Tutorials.
The basic idea is the same for all approaches:
- Share a new firmware image on a computer over NFS (Tutorial on setting up NFS can be found here)
- Tell the camera the NFS share and start the reflash script
The new GUI should do this in a tidy manner and verifies that the share is working correctly and that all required firmware files are valid before letting you press the Reflash button.